Occupational and Environmental Health Practice Exam 2025 – Your Comprehensive All-In-One Guide to Mastering Disease and Injury Prevention!

Image Description

Question: 1 / 400

Which U.S. Supreme Court case changed the manner in which judges decide whether scientific evidence can be used in court in 1993?

Roe v. Wade

Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

In 1993, the U.S. Supreme Court case Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. changed the manner in which judges decide whether scientific evidence can be used in court. This case set a new standard for admitting expert testimony in federal trials, requiring judges to assess the reliability and relevance of the scientific evidence being presented. The other options, Roe v. Wade, Miranda v. Arizona, and Brown v. Board of Education, all address different legal issues and did not have a direct impact on the admissibility of scientific evidence in court.

Get further explanation with Examzify DeepDiveBeta

Miranda v. Arizona

Brown v. Board of Education

Next Question

Report this question

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy